Karl Heideck’s Outstanding Role In Litigation

Litigation is the process of initiating proceedings between two parties in conflict with the purpose of enforcing or defending a legal right. Mostly, litigation is meant to be settled by agreement between the parties, but it may also be heard and decided by a judge in court. Litigation is not merely another name for a lawsuit as other processes precede the lawsuit. There are pre-suit negotiations, arbitrations, facilitations and appeals in the litigation process.

The dictionary’s definition of a litigator is someone who “specializes in taking legal action against people and organizations.” A litigator participates in the whole part of litigation not just the part before a judge in the courtroom. Litigators must hold a bachelor’s degree and a law degree from any accredited law school. Litigators take general law courses including constitutional law, courtroom presentation, and negotiation procedures. In addition to this, litigators may also take classes in real estate law, occupational safety, regulatory legislation and business ethics to improve on competence and make them conversant with the broad scope that litigation covers.

About Karl Heideck
Karl Heideck is a Philadelphia-based attorney specializing in litigation, compliance and risk management. Karl Heideck has been a practitioner for over ten years, and his academic credentials speak much. After graduation, Karl Heideck was an Associate at Conrad O’Brien, a Philadelphia-based law firm. Here Karl Heideck undertook several litigator roles. He handled cases of white-collar crime and government investigations. He built a reputation as a top-notch litigator, and Pepper Hamilton LLP offered him the position of Project Attorney.

Click Here for more information on Heideck.

In this role, Karl Heideck continued his specialization in handling government investigation and white collar defense as well as bankruptcy cases. After just four years, Karl Heideck was able to use his experience in litigation into being a Contract Attorney at Grant & Eisenhofer, a national law firm, PA. The intrigues of this position demand that Karl specializes in the discovery phase for court cases involving securities fraud and also banking litigation. Bragging a superb practice, Karl Heideck is now licensed in General Practice because of his brilliant reputation.

Read more on Crunchbase.

The Securus Technology Victory Over Falsehood

Securus Technologies is a leading communications company that caters to correctional institutions, law enforcement agencies, and safety organizations. They serve on a current basis over 3,400 clients and over 1.2 million inmates all over the North American continent.

 

The services that are provided to those who are incarcerated makes all the difference in their lives as they can stay in touch with family and friends on a daily basis if they wish. Services are available with Android phones, iPhones, tablets and landline telephone systems. Calling plans include direct billing, collect calls, inmate debit, where the call is paid for by the inmate, and prepaid calling.

 

Video calls are a very popular plan as both the inmate and the family can see one another. Video calls can replace a physical visit to the correctional facility and save valuable time for both the inmate and the family. There is a money transfer availability along with Jail Voicemail, and email.

 

In recent months, GTL, who is a competitor has been screaming and boasting how much better their company is compared to Securus. Their misguided lies shout that they are priced much lower and that their servicing abilities overwhelm those of Securus. The stories that were being told rival the fairy tales in Aesop’s Fables.

 

Securus made the decision to smoke out the wolves, so they offered a challenge to lay out the metrics from both companies, with proofs to show the reality of what is happening. A disinterested third party would officiate the matter, and then the truth would be decided impartially.

 

The first sound to come from GTL was nothing. The silence was deafening. Then a few weeks later, GTL politely declined, and that ended that. They did not apologize or retract any of their supercilious statements, but it was over. The fact is that it would be impossible for a company the size of Securus to maintain its momentum if things were as GTL proposed.